Fish v. Lack

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Fish v. Lack

1931 OK 177, 5 P.2d 759, 148 Okla. 260, 1931 Okla. LEXIS 876

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedApril 28, 1931

Docket19937

StatusPublished

This text of 1931 OK 177 (Fish v. Lack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fish v. Lack, 1931 OK 177, 5 P.2d 759, 148 Okla. 260, 1931 Okla. LEXIS 876 (Okla. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

RILEY, J.

In this case substantially the same state of facts is pleaded as in En-le-te-ke et al. v. W. A. Beasley et al., No. 19939, this day decided, 148 Okla. 255, 298 Pac. 611, with which this case, together with others, was consolidated.

The judgment is accordingly affirmed.

LESTER, C. J., and HEFNER, CULLISON, SWINDALL, ANDREWS, McNEILL. and KORNEIGAY, JJ., concur. CLARK, V. C. J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RILEY, J.

In this case substantially the same state of facts is pleaded as in En-le-te-ke et al. v. W. A. Beasley et al., No. 19939, this day decided, 148 Okla. 255, 298 Pac. 611, with which this case, together with others, was consolidated.

The judgment is accordingly affirmed.

LESTER, C. J., and HEFNER, CULLISON, SWINDALL, ANDREWS, McNEILL. and KORNEIGAY, JJ., concur. CLARK, V. C. J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1931 OK 177, 5 P.2d 759, 148 Okla. 260, 1931 Okla. LEXIS 876, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fish-v-lack-okla-1931.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack