Fish v. Lack

1931 OK 177, 5 P.2d 759, 148 Okla. 260, 1931 Okla. LEXIS 876

Opinion

RILEY, J.

In this case substantially the same state of facts is pleaded as in En-le-te-ke et al. v. W. A. Beasley et al., No. 19939, this day decided, 148 Okla. 255, 298 Pac. 611, with which this case, together with others, was consolidated.

The judgment is accordingly affirmed.

LESTER, C. J., and HEFNER, CULLISON, SWINDALL, ANDREWS, McNEILL. and KORNEIGAY, JJ., concur. CLARK, V. C. J., not participating.