Fish v. Frye

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Fish v. Frye

116 A. 923, 121 Me. 582, 1922 Me. LEXIS 47

DecidedMarch 16, 1922

StatusPublished

This text of 116 A. 923 (Fish v. Frye) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fish v. Frye, 116 A. 923, 121 Me. 582, 1922 Me. LEXIS 47 (Me. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

This is an action for malicious prosecution, tried in the Superior Court for the County of' Androscoggin. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of eighty-seven dollars and fifty cents. The case is before the court on the defendant’s general motion.

After a very careful examination of the evidence, we are unable to conclude that the verdict is manifestly wrong. The entry will be. Motion overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This is an action for malicious prosecution, tried in the Superior Court for the County of' Androscoggin. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of eighty-seven dollars and fifty cents. The case is before the court on the defendant’s general motion.

After a very careful examination of the evidence, we are unable to conclude that the verdict is manifestly wrong. The entry will be. Motion overruled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

116 A. 923, 121 Me. 582, 1922 Me. LEXIS 47, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fish-v-frye-me-1922.