Fish v. Frink

188 N.W. 571, 152 Minn. 552, 1922 Minn. LEXIS 602
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided June 9, 1922·No. No. 22,825·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an action in forcible entry and unlawful detainer commenced in the municipal court of Minneapolis to recover possession of premises after an alleged default in a contract of sale. After a trial a decision was filed and judgment for possession was rendered.

The questions argued in appellant’s brief all relate to the sufficiency of evidence and to rulings made on the trial. The case was tried without a reporter and no record of testimony was made. There is no bill1 of exceptions or settled case. In the absence of some record this court has no means of determining the questions sought to be reviewed and the judgment must be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fish v. Frink, 188 N.W. 571, 152 Minn. 552, 1922 Minn. LEXIS 602 (Mich. 1922).

188 N.W. 571 (Fish v. Frink) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hammond v. Flour City Coal and Oil Co.
14 N.W.2d 452 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1944)
Doyle v. Swanson
288 N.W. 152 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1939)