Fish v. Fish

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Fish v. Fish

883 A.2d 1243, 275 Conn. 924, 2005 Conn. LEXIS 417, 2005 WL 2841346

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided September 20, 2005·No. SC 17500·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 90 Conn. App. 744 (AC 24542), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court was not required to apply a heightened jurisdictional pleading requirement and burden of persuasion as required under Roth v. Weston, 259 Conn. 202, 234-35, 789 A.2d 431 (2002)?”

[925] Decided September 20, 2005 Louis Kiefer, in support of the petition. Emily J. Moskowitz, in opposition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 90 Conn. App. 744 (AC 24542), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court was not required to apply a heightened jurisdictional pleading requirement and burden of persuasion as required under Roth v. Weston, 259 Conn. 202, 234-35, 789 A.2d 431 (2002)?”

[925] Decided September 20, 2005 Louis Kiefer, in support of the petition. Emily J. Moskowitz, in opposition.

Fish v. Fish, 883 A.2d 1243, 275 Conn. 924, 2005 Conn. LEXIS 417, 2005 WL 2841346 (Colo. 2005).

Pincite

883 A.2d 1243 (Fish v. Fish) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related