Fish v. Fear

116 P. 1083, 64 Wash. 414, 1911 Wash. LEXIS 841
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 3, 1911
DocketNo. 9402
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 116 P. 1083 (Fish v. Fear) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fish v. Fear, 116 P. 1083, 64 Wash. 414, 1911 Wash. LEXIS 841 (Wash. 1911).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an action to quiet title, but in effect to set aside and vacate a tax deed executed and delivered by the treasurer of Yakima county, more than three years prior to the commencement of the action.

The only question before us is whether the tax deed, conceded to be regular in form, is of itself sufficient to sustain respondents’ title, after the running of the statute of limitations, Rem. & Bal. Code, § 162. Appellant contends there is an irregularity in the tax foreclosure proceedings which deprived the court of jurisdiction, and that he is now entitled to question the validity of the foreclosure decree upon [415]*415which the tax sale and the tax deed are predicated. The trial court entered an order of dismissal, for the reason that the action had not been commenced within the time limited by law. On the authority of Huber v. Brown, 57 Wash. 654, 107 Pac. 850, and Baylis v. Kerrich, ante p. 410, 116 Pac. 1082, the judgment must be affirmed. It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sparks v. Standard Lumber Co.
159 P. 812 (Washington Supreme Court, 1916)
Wilson v. Korte
157 P. 47 (Washington Supreme Court, 1916)
Miller v. Simmons
121 P. 462 (Washington Supreme Court, 1912)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
116 P. 1083, 64 Wash. 414, 1911 Wash. LEXIS 841, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fish-v-fear-wash-1911.