Fish v. Dana
10 Mass. 46
This text of 10 Mass. 46 (Fish v. Dana) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Fish v. Dana, 10 Mass. 46 (Mass. 1813).
Opinion
The rejoinder is immaterial. The defendant was to take his own time to discharge the mortgage and pay the notes mentioned. But he was, in all events, to indemnify the plaintiff, lie has failed so to do; and the plaintiff is entitled to judgment.
ADDITIONAL NOTE.
[See, as to bonds of indemnity, Negrus, 7 Wend. 499. — Chace vs. Hinman, 8 Wend, 452. —F. H.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Montgomery Door & Sash Co. v. Atlantic Lumber Co.
92 N.E. 71 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1910)
Ewing v. Reilly
34 Mo. 113 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1863)
Conner v. Bean
43 N.H. 202 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1861)
Pope v. Hays
19 Tex. 375 (Texas Supreme Court, 1857)
Marshall v. Cobleigh
18 N.H. 485 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1846)
Richards v. Whittle
16 N.H. 259 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1844)
Town of Lyman v. Lull
4 N.H. 495 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1828)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
10 Mass. 46, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fish-v-dana-mass-1813.