Fish v. Confield

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Fish v. Confield

254 A.D. 583, 4 N.Y.S.2d 159, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6655

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 25, 1938

StatusPublished

This text of 254 A.D. 583 (Fish v. Confield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fish v. Confield, 254 A.D. 583, 4 N.Y.S.2d 159, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6655 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

On appeal by plaintiff, a trustee in bankruptcy, from a judgment in favor of the defendant, a marshal of the city of New York, in an action for damages for alleged conversion of personal property of the bankrupt through a sale upon executions issued out of the Municipal Court of the City of New York, which sale was allegedly not conducted according to law by the defendant, the executions having been issued prior to the bankruptcy, judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Davis, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On appeal by plaintiff, a trustee in bankruptcy, from a judgment in favor of the defendant, a marshal of the city of New York, in an action for damages for alleged conversion of personal property of the bankrupt through a sale upon executions issued out of the Municipal Court of the City of New York, which sale was allegedly not conducted according to law by the defendant, the executions having been issued prior to the bankruptcy, judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Davis, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

254 A.D. 583, 4 N.Y.S.2d 159, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6655, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fish-v-confield-nyappdiv-1938.