Fish v. City of New York
This text of 48 A.D.3d 412 (Fish v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an [413]*413action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiff Constance Fish appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schneier, J.), dated October 23, 2006, which, upon the granting of the defendants’ application in limine to preclude her engineering expert from testifying and to dismiss the complaint, is in favor of the defendants and against her dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.
The appellant has failed to provide an adequate record for the Court to review. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal (see CPLR 5526; 22 NYCRR 670.10-b [b]). Rivera, J.P., Ritter, Lifson and Carni, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
48 A.D.3d 412, 849 N.Y.S.2d 795, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fish-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-2008.