Fish v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp.

246 A.D. 843
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 15, 1936
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 246 A.D. 843 (Fish v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fish v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp., 246 A.D. 843 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Opinion

After a signal to stop had been given, the plaintiff, a passenger on defendant’s trolley car, arose from his seat for the purpose of leaving. When he had taken about two steps in the direction of the door, the car stopped suddenly, as he alleges, and he fell on his knee. He brought this action to recover damages for the injuries sustained. At the close of the entire ease the complaint was dismissed because of his failure to show negligence on the part of defendant. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present —Young, Cars-well, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harris v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority
138 A.D.2d 56 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Weinman v. Murray
256 A.D. 1109 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1939)
Bergman v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp.
163 Misc. 762 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
246 A.D. 843, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fish-v-brooklyn-queens-transit-corp-nyappdiv-1936.