Fish v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp.

246 A.D. 843
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 1936·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

After a signal to stop had been given, the plaintiff, a passenger on defendant’s trolley car, arose from his seat for the purpose of leaving. When he had taken about two steps in the direction of the door, the car stopped suddenly, as he alleges, and he fell on his knee. He brought this action to recover damages for the injuries sustained. At the close of the entire ease the complaint was dismissed because of his failure to show negligence on the part of defendant. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present —Young, Cars-well, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fish v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp., 246 A.D. 843 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

246 A.D. 843 (Fish v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harris v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority
138 A.D.2d 56 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Weinman v. Murray
256 A.D. 1109 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1939)
Bergman v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp.
163 Misc. 762 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1937)