Fish v. Attorney Grievance Commission
740 N.W.2d 252, 2007 Mich. LEXIS 2721, 2007 WL 3146607
This text of 740 N.W.2d 252 (Fish v. Attorney Grievance Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Fish v. Attorney Grievance Commission, 740 N.W.2d 252, 2007 Mich. LEXIS 2721, 2007 WL 3146607 (Mich. 2007).
Opinion
Vandarlyn FISH, Plaintiff,
v.
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Defendant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the complaint for superintending control is considered, and relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
PEOPLE OF FARMINGTON HILLS v. Hoops
740 N.W.2d 252 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2007)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
740 N.W.2d 252, 2007 Mich. LEXIS 2721, 2007 WL 3146607, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fish-v-attorney-grievance-commission-mich-2007.