Fischman v. Joseph Fish Hat Co.
122 N.J.L. 428
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Chief Justice, Paekee, Bodine, Hehee, Peeskie, Hetfield, Deae, Wells, WolfsKeil, Raffeety, Hague, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fischman v. Joseph Fish Hat Co., 122 N.J.L. 428 (N.J. 1939).
122 N.J.L. 428 (Fischman v. Joseph Fish Hat Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.