Fischman v. Joseph Fish Hat Co.
5 A.2d 785, 122 N.J.L. 428, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 331
This text of 5 A.2d 785 (Fischman v. Joseph Fish Hat Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Fischman v. Joseph Fish Hat Co., 5 A.2d 785, 122 N.J.L. 428, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 331 (N.J. 1939).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, BODINE, HEHER, PERSKIE, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None. *Page 431
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
5 A.2d 785, 122 N.J.L. 428, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fischman-v-joseph-fish-hat-co-nj-1939.