Fischler v. Kaufman
This text of 246 A.D. 634 (Fischler v. Kaufman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to foreclose a mortgage, order fixing the rental value of a portion of the premises and directing tenants to attorn to a receiver modified so as to provide that Jennie Kaufman, the tenant, and Jacob Kaufman, her husband, the occupant of the ground floor and basement, are directed to attorn to the receiver. As so modified, the order, in so far as appealed from, is affirmed, with costs to respondent. Young, Carswell, Seudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., dissents and votes to reverse the order and deny the motion upon the ground that Jacob Kaufman was the owner of the premises and in actual possession thereof, and, therefore, is not required to pay rent either for the apartment or for the store and basement. (Holmes v. Gravenhorst, 263 N. Y. 148.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
246 A.D. 634, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fischler-v-kaufman-nyappdiv-1935.