Fischer v. Verizon New York, Inc.

S.D. New York

Fischer v. Verizon New York, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided August 31, 2022·No. 1:18-cv-11628·Unknown

Opinion

USDC-SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOC#: SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED: 08/31/2022

JAMES FISCHER, Plaintiff, y No. 18-CV-11628 (RA) VERIZON NEW YORK, INC., VERIZON ORDER COMMUNICATIONS, INC., and VERIZON ONLINE, LLC, Defendants.

Ronnie Abrams, United States District Judge: It has been reported to the Court that a settlement has been reached among all parties. Accordingly, it is hereby: ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without fees or costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s docket if the application to restore the action is made within sixty (60) days. Any application to reopen this action must be filed within sixty (60) days of this order, and any application filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. If the parties seek to have the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement, the terms of the agreement must be placed on the public record and “so ordered” by the Court within the same sixty-day period. See Hendrickson v. United States, 791 F.3d 354, 358 (2d Cir. 2015). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case. SO ORDERED. Date: August 31, 2022 New York, New York Ke ( Hon. Ronnie Abrams United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

USDC-SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOC#: SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED: 08/31/2022

JAMES FISCHER, Plaintiff, y No. 18-CV-11628 (RA) VERIZON NEW YORK, INC., VERIZON ORDER COMMUNICATIONS, INC., and VERIZON ONLINE, LLC, Defendants.

Ronnie Abrams, United States District Judge: It has been reported to the Court that a settlement has been reached among all parties. Accordingly, it is hereby: ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without fees or costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s docket if the application to restore the action is made within sixty (60) days. Any application to reopen this action must be filed within sixty (60) days of this order, and any application filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. If the parties seek to have the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement, the terms of the agreement must be placed on the public record and “so ordered” by the Court within the same sixty-day period. See Hendrickson v. United States, 791 F.3d 354, 358 (2d Cir. 2015). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case. SO ORDERED. Date: August 31, 2022 New York, New York Ke ( Hon. Ronnie Abrams United States District Judge

Fischer v. Verizon New York, Inc., (S.D.N.Y. 2022).

Pincite

Fischer v. Verizon New York, Inc. (Fischer v. Verizon New York, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related