Fischer v. Tushnett

256 A.D. 833, 9 N.Y.S.2d 254, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5073
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 23, 1939
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 256 A.D. 833 (Fischer v. Tushnett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fischer v. Tushnett, 256 A.D. 833, 9 N.Y.S.2d 254, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5073 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from so much of an order entered on his motion to dismiss the complaint for plaintiff’s unreasonable neglect to proceed in the action as granted plaintiff permission to serve and file a note of issue for the December, 1938, term of the court. Order modified by striking out everything after the word “ granted” in the first decretal paragraph and by striking out the second decretal paragraph, [834]*834and as thus modified affirmed, with ten dollars Costs and disbursements to the appellant. Plaintiff failed to explain or excuse the delay of more than twenty-two months in bringing the cause on for trial, and also failed to make an adequate, or any, showing of merits. It was an improper exercise of discretion to deny the motion, in effect, by granting it conditionally. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Goldner Trucking Corp. v. Stoll Packing Corp.
37 Misc. 2d 102 (New York Supreme Court, 1962)
Georgopoulous v. Beach Haven Apartments, No. 3, Inc.
17 Misc. 2d 445 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1959)
Elsters v. Yudin
15 Misc. 2d 983 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1958)
Munroe v. Vaskowitz
6 Misc. 2d 673 (New York County Courts, 1957)
Glasser v. Ritzer
1 A.D.2d 1041 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1956)
Brassner Mfg. Co. v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.
1 A.D.2d 840 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1956)
Tomczak v. Roetzer
283 A.D. 851 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1954)
Giovannucci v. Brooklyn & Richmond Ferry Co.
278 A.D. 861 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1951)
Klenotic v. Brush
278 A.D. 772 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
256 A.D. 833, 9 N.Y.S.2d 254, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5073, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fischer-v-tushnett-nyappdiv-1939.