Fischer v. Trustees of Clifton Springs

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Fischer v. Trustees of Clifton Springs

140 A.D. 918

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 15, 1910

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 140 A.D. 918 (Fischer v. Trustees of Clifton Springs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fischer v. Trustees of Clifton Springs, 140 A.D. 918 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Kruse, J., . who dissented upon the ground that what the plaintiff did in diverting the waters of the stream while acting as water commissioner for the village does, not preclude him from asserting and enforcing the right which he subsequently-acquired under his deed of conveyance to have the waters of; the stream run in the original channel across the lands in question, and except Robson, J., not f voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Kruse, J., . who dissented upon the ground that what the plaintiff did in diverting the waters of the stream while acting as water commissioner for the village does, not preclude him from asserting and enforcing the right which he subsequently-acquired under his deed of conveyance to have the waters of; the stream run in the original channel across the lands in question, and except Robson, J., not f voting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

140 A.D. 918, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fischer-v-trustees-of-clifton-springs-nyappdiv-1910.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack