Fischer v. Shugg

19 Misc. 2d 555, 195 N.Y.S.2d 417, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3549
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided June 4, 1959·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Service of the notice of motion on attorneys who had no authority to appear for the landlord was not service upon the latter. Accordingly, the court had no jurisdiction to entertain the motion (cf. Bittson v. Bittson, 3 A D 2d 847).

The order dated March 23, 1959 should be reversed, with $10 costs, and final order reinstated, without prejudice to renewal of tenant’s motion to vacate final order upon proper notice to landlord.

Concur — Hoestadter, J. P., Hecht and Aurelio, JJ.

Order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fischer v. Shugg, 19 Misc. 2d 555, 195 N.Y.S.2d 417, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3549 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

19 Misc. 2d 555 (Fischer v. Shugg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Edgar v. Garrett
456 P.2d 944 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1969)