Fischer v. Seamen's Church Institute

275 A.D.2d 947

This text of 275 A.D.2d 947 (Fischer v. Seamen's Church Institute) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fischer v. Seamen's Church Institute, 275 A.D.2d 947 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1949).

Opinion

In our opinion the papers on appeal establish that there was a sufficiently broad agency or delegation of power by the defendant corporation to the person upon whom the summons was served to constitute him a managing agent of that defendant within the meaning and purview of subdivision 8 of section 228 of the Civil Practice Act. (Barrett v. American Tel. & Tel. Co., 138 N. Y. 491, 493; Taylor v. Granite State Provident Assn., 136 N. Y. 343, 346; Tauza v. Susquehanna Coal Co., 220 N. Y. 259, 270, and cases there cited.) Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur. [See post, pp. 961, 1045.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Taylor v. Granite State Provident Ass'n
32 N.E. 992 (New York Court of Appeals, 1893)
Barrett v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.
34 N.E. 289 (New York Court of Appeals, 1893)
Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.
115 N.E. 915 (New York Court of Appeals, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
275 A.D.2d 947, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fischer-v-seamens-church-institute-nyappdiv-1949.