Fischer v. Sacca

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Fischer v. Sacca

37 A.D.2d 839, 325 N.Y.S.2d 1009, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3370

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 4, 1971

StatusPublished

This text of 37 A.D.2d 839 (Fischer v. Sacca) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fischer v. Sacca, 37 A.D.2d 839, 325 N.Y.S.2d 1009, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3370 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR to review respondents’ determination, dated September 15, 1970, denying petitioner’s application for an area variance, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the 'Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered March 1, 1971, which denied the application and confirmed the determination. Judgment affirmed, with costs. In our opinion, in the light of the record herein, the determination of the Court of Appeals in the Matter of Cherry Hill Homes v. Barbiere (28 N Y 2d 381), and for the reasons stated by the respondent Zoning Board in the determination under review, Special Term properly denied petitioner’s application. Rabin, P. J., Hopkins, Munder, Latham and Christ, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR to review respondents’ determination, dated September 15, 1970, denying petitioner’s application for an area variance, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the 'Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered March 1, 1971, which denied the application and confirmed the determination. Judgment affirmed, with costs. In our opinion, in the light of the record herein, the determination of the Court of Appeals in the Matter of Cherry Hill Homes v. Barbiere (28 N Y 2d 381), and for the reasons stated by the respondent Zoning Board in the determination under review, Special Term properly denied petitioner’s application. Rabin, P. J., Hopkins, Munder, Latham and Christ, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 A.D.2d 839, 325 N.Y.S.2d 1009, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3370, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fischer-v-sacca-nyappdiv-1971.