Fischer v. Provident Mutual Life Insurance Co. of Philadelphia
This text of 283 A.D. 779 (Fischer v. Provident Mutual Life Insurance Co. of Philadelphia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— We have come to the conclusion that giving the appellant full benefit of the evidence offered and excluded, no case was made out to go to the jury and a verdict should have been directed in plaintiff’s favor. There was no prejudice therefore in the matters complained of justifying a new trial. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Peek, P. J., Callahan, Breitel, Bastow and Botein, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
283 A.D. 779, 129 N.Y.S.2d 497, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6516, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fischer-v-provident-mutual-life-insurance-co-of-philadelphia-nyappdiv-1954.