Fischer v. Plum

273 A.D. 818, 76 N.Y.S.2d 85, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4782
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 26, 1948·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment reversed on the law and the facts, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with $10 costs. Defendant did not show by evidentiary facts that plaintiff had any knowledge of the alleged false and fraudulent representations made by the payee of the note, from whom plaintiff obtained it for value, before maturity and in good faith and, therefore, did not establish a triable issue with respect to whether or not plaintiff was a holder in due course. (Bogers v. Beynolds, 226 App. Div. 813.) Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fischer v. Plum, 273 A.D. 818, 76 N.Y.S.2d 85, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4782 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1948).

273 A.D. 818 (Fischer v. Plum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Household Discount Corp. v. Gleasman
42 Misc. 2d 344 (New York Supreme Court, 1964)
South Shore Securities Co. v. Goode
5 Misc. 2d 972 (New York Supreme Court, 1957)