Fischer v. New York City Railway Co.

54 Misc. 267, 104 N.Y.S. 400
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided May 15, 1907·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff in this action recovered a judgment against the defendant for a penalty for failure to give a transfer while the plaintiff was a passenger on one of its cars. The plaintiff boarded a north bound car at Chambers street and Broadway. He rode until he reached Twenty-third street. The ear there turning into Lexington avenue, he for the first time asked the conductor for a transfer, which was refused. He then left the car and boarded a Twenty-third street car, paying another fare. The reasonableness of the rule promulgated by the defendant requiring a passenger to ask for a transfer at the time he pays a fare has been upheld by the Appellate Division in the case of Ketchum v. New York City R. Co., 118 App. Div. 248. The judgment must, therefore, be reversed.

Present: Gildersleeve, Seabury, and Brady, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fischer v. New York City Railway Co., 54 Misc. 267, 104 N.Y.S. 400 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).

54 Misc. 267 (Fischer v. New York City Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ketchum v. New York City Railway Co.
118 A.D. 248 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1907)