Fischer v. Kieley & Mueller, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Fischer v. Kieley & Mueller, Inc.

74 A.D.2d 894, 425 N.Y.S.2d 974, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10689

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 24, 1980

StatusPublished

This text of 74 A.D.2d 894 (Fischer v. Kieley & Mueller, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fischer v. Kieley & Mueller, Inc., 74 A.D.2d 894, 425 N.Y.S.2d 974, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10689 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to review an order of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated October 1, 1979, which (1) annulled an order of the State Division of Human Rights, [895]*895dated May 28, 1979, which dismissed petitioner’s complaint upon a finding of no probable cause, and (2) dismissed the complaint on the ground that it was not processed within the statutorily prescribed period. Petition granted to the extent that the order of the appeal board is annulled, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the appeal board for a determination on the merits of the issues raised by petitioner’s appeal to it (see Matter of Sarkisian Bros, v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 48 NY2d 816). Damiani, J. P., Titone, Margett and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to review an order of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated October 1, 1979, which (1) annulled an order of the State Division of Human Rights, [895]*895dated May 28, 1979, which dismissed petitioner’s complaint upon a finding of no probable cause, and (2) dismissed the complaint on the ground that it was not processed within the statutorily prescribed period. Petition granted to the extent that the order of the appeal board is annulled, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the appeal board for a determination on the merits of the issues raised by petitioner’s appeal to it (see Matter of Sarkisian Bros, v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 48 NY2d 816). Damiani, J. P., Titone, Margett and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

74 A.D.2d 894, 425 N.Y.S.2d 974, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10689, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fischer-v-kieley-mueller-inc-nyappdiv-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack