Fischer v. Gargano
Opinion
| Fischer v Gargano |
| 2021 NY Slip Op 00657 |
| Decided on February 5, 2021 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on February 5, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, TROUTMAN, AND WINSLOW, JJ.
23.1 CA 19-01253
v
JOSEPH GARGANO, SENIOR, AND JOSEPH GARGANO, JUNIOR, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
THOMAS & SOLOMON LLP, ROCHESTER (JESSICA L. LUKASIEWICZ OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS.
GROSS SHUMAN P.C., BUFFALO (KEVIN R. LELONEK OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Henry J. Nowak, J.), entered June 7, 2019. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against defendant Joseph Gargano, Senior.
Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of discontinuance signed by the attorneys for the parties on December 21, 2020,
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.
Entered: February 5, 2021
Mark W. Bennett
Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2021 NY Slip Op 00657 (Fischer v. Gargano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.