Fischer v. Fischer

202 A.D.2d 331, 609 N.Y.S.2d 218
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 24, 1994
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 202 A.D.2d 331 (Fischer v. Fischer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fischer v. Fischer, 202 A.D.2d 331, 609 N.Y.S.2d 218 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.), entered September 22, 1993, which, inter alia, granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and denied plaintiff’s cross motion to inter alia, amend the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In this family dispute, plaintiff seeks to prevent the sale of a family residence, and to undo the sale of other property, by his mother, claiming that she held it for his deceased father and subsequently for all of the father’s offspring only as constructive trustee. We agree with the IAS Court that plaintiff’s allegations, even including those in his proposed amended complaint, do not make out a cause of action for a constructive trust (Sharp v Kosmalski, 40 NY2d 119; Hazlett v Fusco, 177 AD2d 813). Plaintiff, as an interested party, is not competent to testify as to his father’s statements (CPLR 4519). [332]*332We have considered plaintiffs remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Rosenberger, Asch and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Eshaghian
100 A.D.3d 751 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
202 A.D.2d 331, 609 N.Y.S.2d 218, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fischer-v-fischer-nyappdiv-1994.