Fischer v. Fischer

202 A.D.2d 331, 609 N.Y.S.2d 218
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 24, 1994·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.), entered September 22, 1993, which, inter alia, granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and denied plaintiff’s cross motion to inter alia, amend the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In this family dispute, plaintiff seeks to prevent the sale of a family residence, and to undo the sale of other property, by his mother, claiming that she held it for his deceased father and subsequently for all of the father’s offspring only as constructive trustee. We agree with the IAS Court that plaintiff’s allegations, even including those in his proposed amended complaint, do not make out a cause of action for a constructive trust (Sharp v Kosmalski, 40 NY2d 119; Hazlett v Fusco, 177 AD2d 813). Plaintiff, as an interested party, is not competent to testify as to his father’s statements (CPLR 4519). [332]*332We have considered plaintiffs remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Rosenberger, Asch and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fischer v. Fischer, 202 A.D.2d 331, 609 N.Y.S.2d 218 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

202 A.D.2d 331 (Fischer v. Fischer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Eshaghian
100 A.D.3d 751 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)