Fischer v. El Saieh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Fischer v. El Saieh

23 A.D.2d 695, 258 N.Y.S.2d 635, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4579

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 29, 1965

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 23 A.D.2d 695 (Fischer v. El Saieh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fischer v. El Saieh, 23 A.D.2d 695, 258 N.Y.S.2d 635, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4579 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

—In two separate negligence actions to recover damages for injury to person and property, allegedly sustained as the result of a collision between two automobiles, Patricia J. Cicatello, a defendant in both actions, appeals .from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, entered June 23, 1964, which denied her motion to remove Action No. 2 from the Civil Court of the City of New York and to consolidate it with Action No. 1 in the Supreme Court, Richmond County. 'Order reversed, without costs, and motion granted. Action No. 1 was instituted against the defendant Cicatello by a passenger in her automobile. Action No. 2 was instituted against said defendant by the owner and operator of the other automobile. In our opinion, under the circumstances here, it was an improvident exercise of discretion to deny the motion to remove Action No. 2 and to consolidate the two actions. Christ, Acting P. J., Hill, Rabin, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In two separate negligence actions to recover damages for injury to person and property, allegedly sustained as the result of a collision between two automobiles, Patricia J. Cicatello, a defendant in both actions, appeals .from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, entered June 23, 1964, which denied her motion to remove Action No. 2 from the Civil Court of the City of New York and to consolidate it with Action No. 1 in the Supreme Court, Richmond County. 'Order reversed, without costs, and motion granted. Action No. 1 was instituted against the defendant Cicatello by a passenger in her automobile. Action No. 2 was instituted against said defendant by the owner and operator of the other automobile. In our opinion, under the circumstances here, it was an improvident exercise of discretion to deny the motion to remove Action No. 2 and to consolidate the two actions. Christ, Acting P. J., Hill, Rabin, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

23 A.D.2d 695, 258 N.Y.S.2d 635, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4579, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fischer-v-el-saieh-nyappdiv-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack