Fischer v. Daudistal
9 F. 145, 1881 U.S. App. LEXIS 2460
This text of 9 F. 145 (Fischer v. Daudistal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Fischer v. Daudistal, 9 F. 145, 1881 U.S. App. LEXIS 2460 (uscirct 1881).
Opinion
The court filed a decree refusing the motion to remand, and setting aside the service of the writ as to John F. Hartranft, the collector. No opinion was filed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Clarise Sportswear Co. v. U & W MANUFACTURING COMPANY
223 F. Supp. 961 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1963)
Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. Alvin R. Durham Co.
271 U.S. 251 (Supreme Court, 1926)
Sullivan v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.
76 Pa. Super. 30 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1921)
The Marion
99 F. 448 (D. New Jersey, 1900)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
9 F. 145, 1881 U.S. App. LEXIS 2460, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fischer-v-daudistal-uscirct-1881.