Fischer v. Daudistal
9 F. 145, 1881 U.S. App. LEXIS 2460
Opinion
The court filed a decree refusing the motion to remand, and setting aside the service of the writ as to John F. Hartranft, the collector. No opinion was filed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fischer v. Daudistal, 9 F. 145, 1881 U.S. App. LEXIS 2460 (uscirct 1881).
9 F. 145 (Fischer v. Daudistal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Clarise Sportswear Co. v. U & W MANUFACTURING COMPANY
223 F. Supp. 961 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1963)
Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. Alvin R. Durham Co.
271 U.S. 251 (Supreme Court, 1926)
Sullivan v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.
76 Pa. Super. 30 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1921)
The Marion
99 F. 448 (D. New Jersey, 1900)