Fischer v. Corpening

Missouri Court of Appeals

Fischer v. Corpening

415 S.W.3d 162, 2013 WL 6270614, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1442

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 3, 2013·No. No. WD 76202·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Elizabeth Corpening appeals from a judgment entered in the Circuit Court of Cole County in favor of the Estate of Gary Fischer, denying Appellant’s claim for compensation for services rendered to the Decedent. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal, published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Elizabeth Corpening appeals from a judgment entered in the Circuit Court of Cole County in favor of the Estate of Gary Fischer, denying Appellant’s claim for compensation for services rendered to the Decedent. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal, published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Fischer v. Corpening, 415 S.W.3d 162, 2013 WL 6270614, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1442 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

415 S.W.3d 162 (Fischer v. Corpening) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.