Fischer v. Conhaim

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Fischer v. Conhaim

35 Misc. 791, 72 N.Y.S. 1102

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1901

StatusPublished

This text of 35 Misc. 791 (Fischer v. Conhaim) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fischer v. Conhaim, 35 Misc. 791, 72 N.Y.S. 1102 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1901).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The nonpayment of the bonus, was by the contract of employment, made dependent upon an exercise by the defendants of their reserved right to discharge the plaintiff within the year. He was not discharged, but served the full term, without any expression of dissatisfaction. He was, therefore, entitled to the extra compensation.

Present: Scott, P. J., Beach and Fitzgerald, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The nonpayment of the bonus, was by the contract of employment, made dependent upon an exercise by the defendants of their reserved right to discharge the plaintiff within the year. He was not discharged, but served the full term, without any expression of dissatisfaction. He was, therefore, entitled to the extra compensation.

Present: Scott, P. J., Beach and Fitzgerald, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

35 Misc. 791, 72 N.Y.S. 1102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fischer-v-conhaim-nyappterm-1901.