Fischer v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, S.D. Ohio·Decided July 26, 2021·No. 3:20-cv-00206·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Brandy Fischer, ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:20-cv-00206 Plaintiff, ) ) JUDGE NEWMAN Rice v. ) ) Kilolo Kijakazi,! ) Acting Commissioner of Social ) Security, ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER This cause coming before the Court on the joint motion of the parties, due notice having been given, and the Court being fully advised, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1, The Parties’ Joint Stipulation for an Award of Attorney's Fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act is accepted and the Commissioner shall pay Plaintiff's attorney fees in the amount of $4,600.00 and costs in the amount of $0, for a total award of $4,600.00; 2. Counsel for the parties shall verify whether or not Plaintiff owes a preexisting debt to the United States subject to offset, consistent with Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 560 U.S. 586 (2010). Ifno such pre-existing debt exists, Defendant shall pay the EAJA award directly to Plaintiffs counsel pursuant to the EAJA assignment signed by Plaintiff; and 3, The case remains terminated on the docket of this Court.

1 Kilolo Kijakazi became the Acting Commissioner of Social Security on July 9, 2021. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Kilolo Kijakazi should be substituted, therefore, for Andrew Saul as the defendant in this suit. No further action need be taken to continue this suit by reason of the last sentence of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: ‘JT-24-2021 Entered: hase th Spe,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fischer v. Commissioner of Social Security, (S.D. Ohio 2021).

Fischer v. Commissioner of Social Security (Fischer v. Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Astrue v. Ratliff
560 U.S. 586 (Supreme Court, 2010)