Fischer v. Brewery

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Fischer v. Brewery

255 A.D. 952, 8 N.Y.S.2d 665, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5985

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 9, 1938

StatusPublished

This text of 255 A.D. 952 (Fischer v. Brewery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fischer v. Brewery, 255 A.D. 952, 8 N.Y.S.2d 665, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5985 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted. No privity of contract between plaintiff and the defendant Pure Carbonic, Inc., is pleaded. Recovery against this defendant can only be had upon the theory of negligence. (MacPherson v. Buick Motor Company, 217 N. Y. 382.) The Statute of Limitations has clearly run against that cause of action. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted. No privity of contract between plaintiff and the defendant Pure Carbonic, Inc., is pleaded. Recovery against this defendant can only be had upon the theory of negligence. (MacPherson v. Buick Motor Company, 217 N. Y. 382.) The Statute of Limitations has clearly run against that cause of action. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

255 A.D. 952, 8 N.Y.S.2d 665, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5985, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fischer-v-brewery-nyappdiv-1938.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack