Fischer v. Bergson

49 Cal. 294
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1874
DocketNo. 3,869
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 49 Cal. 294 (Fischer v. Bergson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fischer v. Bergson, 49 Cal. 294 (Cal. 1874).

Opinion

By the Court, McKinstry, J.:

The District Court should have sustained the objection to proof of the declarations of Kuchel, that he occupied the land as owner, and that the conveyance to Bergson was in fact a mortgage. These declarations were not in disparagement of the title of the declarant. They were not offered by the defendant, but by the plaintiff himself to strengthen his own claim. They had no greater force as evidence than they would have had, had the decedent brought this action in his life-time, in which case the inadmissibility of such declarations would be apparent.

Judgment and order denying new trial reversed, and cause remanded.

Mr. Justice Rhodes did not express an opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hall v. San Jose Abstract & Title Insurance
342 P.2d 362 (California Court of Appeal, 1959)
Barcroft v. Livacich
96 P.2d 951 (California Court of Appeal, 1939)
Edson & Foulke Co. v. Winsell
118 P. 243 (California Supreme Court, 1911)
Bollinger v. Bollinger
99 P. 196 (California Supreme Court, 1908)
Bauers v. Bull
78 P. 757 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1904)
Bedell v. Scoggins
40 P. 954 (California Supreme Court, 1895)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
49 Cal. 294, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fischer-v-bergson-cal-1874.