Fischbein v. Fischbein
162 A. 528, 111 N.J. Eq. 446, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 750
Opinion
The order under review will be affirmed, for the reasons stated by Vice-Chancellor Backes.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, BROGAN, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, DEAR, WELLS, KERNEY, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fischbein v. Fischbein, 162 A. 528, 111 N.J. Eq. 446, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 750 (N.J. 1932).
162 A. 528 (Fischbein v. Fischbein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Royce v. Royce
1 A.2d 878 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1938)