Fischback v. Solvay Process Co.

N.D. New York

Fischback v. Solvay Process Co.

29 F. Supp. 583, 1939 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2088

CourtDistrict Court, N.D. New York

DecidedSeptember 19, 1939

DocketNo. 220

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 29 F. Supp. 583 (Fischback v. Solvay Process Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fischback v. Solvay Process Co., 29 F. Supp. 583, 1939 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2088 (N.D.N.Y. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

BRYANT, District Judge.

The motion for bill of particulars, now under consideration, must be limited to information necessary to enable defendant to prepare its answer. Tully v. Howard et. al., D.C., 27 F.Supp. 6.

I have attempted to determine the particulars, not set forth in the complaint, which defendant requires for that purpose. I direct that plaintiff answer paragraphs one, two, three, eight, nine and ten of the petition as fully as his knowledge and information permits.

An order may be presented directing service of such a bill on defendant’s attorney within twenty days from date of service. It may also contain a provision that defendant has twenty days from date of service of the bill of particulars in which to answer.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRYANT, District Judge.

The motion for bill of particulars, now under consideration, must be limited to information necessary to enable defendant to prepare its answer. Tully v. Howard et. al., D.C., 27 F.Supp. 6.

I have attempted to determine the particulars, not set forth in the complaint, which defendant requires for that purpose. I direct that plaintiff answer paragraphs one, two, three, eight, nine and ten of the petition as fully as his knowledge and information permits.

An order may be presented directing service of such a bill on defendant’s attorney within twenty days from date of service. It may also contain a provision that defendant has twenty days from date of service of the bill of particulars in which to answer.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 F. Supp. 583, 1939 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2088, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fischback-v-solvay-process-co-nynd-1939.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack