Fisch v. Rabbani

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Fisch v. Rabbani

266 A.D.2d 460, 698 N.Y.S.2d 888, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12025

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 22, 1999

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 266 A.D.2d 460 (Fisch v. Rabbani) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fisch v. Rabbani, 266 A.D.2d 460, 698 N.Y.S.2d 888, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12025 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR 7510 to confirm an arbitration award dated April 9, 1995, the petitioners appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Shaw, J.), dated September 25, 1998, as denied that branch of their motion which was, in effect, to resettle a judgment of the same court, dated December 5, 1996, entered upon an order confirming the arbitration award, and in their favor in the principal amount of only $111,231.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

The petitioners’ motion sought, in effect, to resettle substantive portions of a judgment. An order denying a motion to resettle substantive portions of a judgment is not appealable (see, G.R.K. Realty Corp. v Tischfeld, 264 AD2d 708; Herzog v Town of Thompson, 251 AD2d 917, 919). Accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed. Bracken, J. P., S. Miller, Thompson and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR 7510 to confirm an arbitration award dated April 9, 1995, the petitioners appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Shaw, J.), dated September 25, 1998, as denied that branch of their motion which was, in effect, to resettle a judgment of the same court, dated December 5, 1996, entered upon an order confirming the arbitration award, and in their favor in the principal amount of only $111,231.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

The petitioners’ motion sought, in effect, to resettle substantive portions of a judgment. An order denying a motion to resettle substantive portions of a judgment is not appealable (see, G.R.K. Realty Corp. v Tischfeld, 264 AD2d 708; Herzog v Town of Thompson, 251 AD2d 917, 919). Accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed. Bracken, J. P., S. Miller, Thompson and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

266 A.D.2d 460, 698 N.Y.S.2d 888, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12025, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fisch-v-rabbani-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack