Firth v. Rehfeldt

New York Supreme Court

Firth v. Rehfeldt

47 N.Y.S. 474

DecidedOctober 11, 1897

StatusPublished

This text of 47 N.Y.S. 474 (Firth v. Rehfeldt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Firth v. Rehfeldt, 47 N.Y.S. 474 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1897).

Pincite

Opinion

GAYNOR, J.

The defendant has the right to make up a case upon specific exceptions or questions, and to print only such evidence as relates thereto. She cannot be required to print the evidence for a [475]*475review of the facts when she does not want such review. Let the case go back for settlement accordingly. I do not see why the respondent wants evidence printed to. review the facts. On the con- • trary, if the appellant does not want it, it is for the respondent to have the case so settled as to make that fact fully appear.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GAYNOR, J.

The defendant has the right to make up a case upon specific exceptions or questions, and to print only such evidence as relates thereto. She cannot be required to print the evidence for a [475]*475review of the facts when she does not want such review. Let the case go back for settlement accordingly. I do not see why the respondent wants evidence printed to. review the facts. On the con- • trary, if the appellant does not want it, it is for the respondent to have the case so settled as to make that fact fully appear.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

47 N.Y.S. 474, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/firth-v-rehfeldt-nysupct-1897.