Firth v. Laurie

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Firth v. Laurie

375 A.2d 970, 118 R.I. 951, 1977 R.I. LEXIS 1669

Supreme Court of Rhode Island·Decided June 23, 1977·No. M. P. No. 77-213·Published

Opinion

Treating the petition for habeas corpus as a motion for bail pending appeal pursuant to Rule 9, the respondent is directed to file his answer to the motion and therein to show cause, if any he has, why the writ should not issue as prayed, said answer to be made in compliance with the provisions of Rule 14, to which reference is made herein.

The petitioner is directed to file the transcript of the hearing in Superior Court in which he was denied bail.

Bevilacqua, [952]*952C. J., not participating. Bevilacqua & Cicilline, John F. Cicilline, for petitioner. Julius C. Michaelson, Attorney General, for respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Treating the petition for habeas corpus as a motion for bail pending appeal pursuant to Rule 9, the respondent is directed to file his answer to the motion and therein to show cause, if any he has, why the writ should not issue as prayed, said answer to be made in compliance with the provisions of Rule 14, to which reference is made herein.

The petitioner is directed to file the transcript of the hearing in Superior Court in which he was denied bail.

Bevilacqua, [952]*952C. J., not participating. Bevilacqua & Cicilline, John F. Cicilline, for petitioner. Julius C. Michaelson, Attorney General, for respondent.

Firth v. Laurie, 375 A.2d 970, 118 R.I. 951, 1977 R.I. LEXIS 1669 (R.I. 1977).

Pincite

375 A.2d 970 (Firth v. Laurie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.