Home/Supreme Court of Rhode Island/Firth v. Laurie

Firth v. Laurie

375 A.2d 970, 118 R.I. 951, 1977 R.I. LEXIS 1669
CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island
DecidedJune 23, 1977
DocketM. P. No. 77-213
StatusPublished

This text of 375 A.2d 970 (Firth v. Laurie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Firth v. Laurie, 375 A.2d 970, 118 R.I. 951, 1977 R.I. LEXIS 1669 (R.I. 1977).

Opinion

Treating the petition for habeas corpus as a motion for bail pending appeal pursuant to Rule 9, the respondent is directed to file his answer to the motion and therein to show cause, if any he has, why the writ should not issue as prayed, said answer to be made in compliance with the provisions of Rule 14, to which reference is made herein.

The petitioner is directed to file the transcript of the hearing in Superior Court in which he was denied bail.

Bevilacqua, [952]*952C. J., not participating. Bevilacqua & Cicilline, John F. Cicilline, for petitioner. Julius C. Michaelson, Attorney General, for respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
375 A.2d 970, 118 R.I. 951, 1977 R.I. LEXIS 1669, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/firth-v-laurie-ri-1977.