Firth & Foster Bros. v. Hamill

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Firth & Foster Bros. v. Hamill

31 A. 676, 167 Pa. 382, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 915

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 8, 1895

DocketAppeal, No. 59

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 31 A. 676 (Firth & Foster Bros. v. Hamill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Firth & Foster Bros. v. Hamill, 31 A. 676, 167 Pa. 382, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 915 (Pa. 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The questions involved in this case are clearly stated and correctly disposed of by the learned referee. We find nothing in the record that would justify us in sustaining any of the specifications of error; nor do we think that either of them requires special notice. The judgment of the court below, dismissing appellant’s exceptions and confirming the finding of the referee in favor of plaintiff, is affirmed on the referee’s report.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

The questions involved in this case are clearly stated and correctly disposed of by the learned referee. We find nothing in the record that would justify us in sustaining any of the specifications of error; nor do we think that either of them requires special notice. The judgment of the court below, dismissing appellant’s exceptions and confirming the finding of the referee in favor of plaintiff, is affirmed on the referee’s report.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 A. 676, 167 Pa. 382, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 915, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/firth-foster-bros-v-hamill-pa-1895.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack