FirstMerit Bank, N.A. v. Inks.

Ohio Supreme Court

FirstMerit Bank, N.A. v. Inks.

986 N.E.2d 28, 135 Ohio St. 3d 1410

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 24, 2013

Docket2013-0091

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 986 N.E.2d 28 (FirstMerit Bank, N.A. v. Inks.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

FirstMerit Bank, N.A. v. Inks., 986 N.E.2d 28, 135 Ohio St. 3d 1410 (Ohio 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

Summit App. Nos. 25980 and 26182, 2012-Ohio-5155. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 6 of the court of appeals’ entry filed December 19, 2012:

“Whether Section 1335.05 of the Ohio Revised Code prohibits a party from raising as a defense that the parties to a contract involving an interest in land orally agreed to modify the terms of their agreement.”

Pfeifer and French, JJ., dissent.

The conflict case is Nicolazakes v. Deryk Babrield Tangeman Irrvocable Trust, 10th Dist. No. 00AP-7, 2000 WL 1877521 (Dec. 26, 2000).

Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2013-0203, FirstMerit Bank, N.A. v. Inks, Summit App. No. 26182, 2012-Ohio-5155.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI