FirstKey Homes, LLC v. Kahdaija Arniecia Lamones-Phillip

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided January 21, 2026·No. 25-12406·Unpublished

Opinion

USCA11 Case: 25-12406 Document: 8-1 Date Filed: 01/21/2026 Page: 1 of 2

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 25-12406 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________

FIRSTKEY HOMES, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus

KAHDAIJA ARNIECIA LAMONES-PHILLIP, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia D.C. Docket No. 1:25-cv-03458-VMC ____________________

Before JILL PRYOR, GRANT, and BRASHER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic- tion. Kahdaija Lamones-Phillip, pro se, appeals from the district court’s order remanding the case to Georgia state court. Because USCA11 Case: 25-12406 Document: 8-1 Date Filed: 01/21/2026 Page: 2 of 2

2 Opinion of the Court 25-12406

the order remanded the case for lack of federal subject matter ju- risdiction, it is unreviewable on appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c), (d); New v. Sports & Recreation, 114 F.3d 1092, 1096 (11th Cir. 1997) (“Cases remanded for lack of jurisdiction are immune from review even if the district court’s decision is clearly erroneous.”). Further, Lamones-Phillip did not invoke either 28 U.S.C. §§ 1442 or 1443 as a basis for the removal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d); BP P.L.C. v. Mayor of Balt., 593 U.S. 230, 238-39 (2021) (concluding that, because the defendants cited § 1442 in their notice of removal, the whole of the district court’s remand order was reviewable on appeal).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FirstKey Homes, LLC v. Kahdaija Arniecia Lamones-Phillip, (11th Cir. 2026).

FirstKey Homes, LLC v. Kahdaija Arniecia Lamones-Phillip (FirstKey Homes, LLC v. Kahdaija Arniecia Lamones-Phillip) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

New v. Sports & Recreation, Inc.
114 F.3d 1092 (Eleventh Circuit, 1997)
BP p.l.c. v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore
593 U.S. 230 (Supreme Court, 2021)