First v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

First v. State

209 S.W.3d 527, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1969, 2006 WL 3782897

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 26, 2006·No. No. ED 86880·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jeffrey First appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jeffrey First appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

First v. State, 209 S.W.3d 527, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1969, 2006 WL 3782897 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

209 S.W.3d 527 (First v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.