First United Security Bank v. McCollum

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

First United Security Bank v. McCollum

178 So. 3d 377, 2015 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 40, 2015 WL 836921

CourtCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama

DecidedFebruary 27, 2015

Docket2110828

StatusPublished

This text of 178 So. 3d 377 (First United Security Bank v. McCollum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

First United Security Bank v. McCollum, 178 So. 3d 377, 2015 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 40, 2015 WL 836921 (Ala. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

After Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court

MOORE, Judge.

The prior judgment of this court has been reversed, and the cause remanded by [378]*378the Supreme Court of Alabama. See Ex parte First United Sec. Bank, 178 So.3d 372 (Ala.2014). On remand to this court, and in compliance with the supreme court’s opinion, we hereby reverse the judgment of the Tuscaloosa Circuit Court and remand the cause for the entry of a judgment awarding First United Security Bank and Paty Holdings, LLC, the excess tax-sale proceeds at issue.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

THOMPSON, P.J., and PITTMAN and THOMAS, JJ., concur. , DONALDSON, J.„ recuses himself.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI