First United Security Bank v. McCollum

178 So. 3d 377, 2015 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 40, 2015 WL 836921
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in First United Security Bank v. McCollum. Read the opinion of the Court — 2012 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 324
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama·Decided February 27, 2015·No. 2110828·Published

Opinion

After Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court

MOORE, Judge.

The prior judgment of this court has been reversed, and the cause remanded by [378]*378the Supreme Court of Alabama. See Ex parte First United Sec. Bank, 178 So.3d 372 (Ala.2014). On remand to this court, and in compliance with the supreme court’s opinion, we hereby reverse the judgment of the Tuscaloosa Circuit Court and remand the cause for the entry of a judgment awarding First United Security Bank and Paty Holdings, LLC, the excess tax-sale proceeds at issue.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

THOMPSON, P.J., and PITTMAN and THOMAS, JJ., concur. , DONALDSON, J.„ recuses himself.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

First United Security Bank v. McCollum, 178 So. 3d 377, 2015 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 40, 2015 WL 836921 (Ala. Ct. App. 2015).

178 So. 3d 377 (First United Security Bank v. McCollum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ex parte First United Security Bank and Paty Holdings, LLC.
178 So. 3d 372 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2014)