First Union National Bank v. Bonito

Connecticut Appellate Court

First Union National Bank v. Bonito

720 A.2d 886, 51 Conn. App. 327, 1998 Conn. App. LEXIS 467

Connecticut Appellate Court·Decided December 22, 1998·No. AC 17758; AC 17759; AC 17760; AC 17761·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In these actions to foreclose tax liens, the owner of the equity of redemption with respect to several parcels of land appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motions to open the judgments of strict foreclosure for the purpose of extending the law days. The decision whether to open a foreclosure judgment rests in the discretion of the trial court. General Statutes [328]*328§ 49-15. After a review of the record, we conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in this case. See New Haven Savings Bank v. Gurland, 3 Conn. App. 508, 489 A.2d 1070 (1985).

The judgments are affirmed and the case is remanded for the purpose of setting new law days.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In these actions to foreclose tax liens, the owner of the equity of redemption with respect to several parcels of land appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motions to open the judgments of strict foreclosure for the purpose of extending the law days. The decision whether to open a foreclosure judgment rests in the discretion of the trial court. General Statutes [328]*328§ 49-15. After a review of the record, we conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in this case. See New Haven Savings Bank v. Gurland, 3 Conn. App. 508, 489 A.2d 1070 (1985).

The judgments are affirmed and the case is remanded for the purpose of setting new law days.

First Union National Bank v. Bonito, 720 A.2d 886, 51 Conn. App. 327, 1998 Conn. App. LEXIS 467 (Colo. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

720 A.2d 886 (First Union National Bank v. Bonito) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related