First Union National Bank v. Bonito

Connecticut Appellate Court

First Union National Bank v. Bonito

720 A.2d 886, 51 Conn. App. 327, 1998 Conn. App. LEXIS 467

CourtConnecticut Appellate Court

DecidedDecember 22, 1998

DocketAC 17758; AC 17759; AC 17760; AC 17761

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 720 A.2d 886 (First Union National Bank v. Bonito) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

First Union National Bank v. Bonito, 720 A.2d 886, 51 Conn. App. 327, 1998 Conn. App. LEXIS 467 (Colo. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In these actions to foreclose tax liens, the owner of the equity of redemption with respect to several parcels of land appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motions to open the judgments of strict foreclosure for the purpose of extending the law days. The decision whether to open a foreclosure judgment rests in the discretion of the trial court. General Statutes [328]*328§ 49-15. After a review of the record, we conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in this case. See New Haven Savings Bank v. Gurland, 3 Conn. App. 508, 489 A.2d 1070 (1985).

The judgments are affirmed and the case is remanded for the purpose of setting new law days.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In these actions to foreclose tax liens, the owner of the equity of redemption with respect to several parcels of land appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motions to open the judgments of strict foreclosure for the purpose of extending the law days. The decision whether to open a foreclosure judgment rests in the discretion of the trial court. General Statutes [328]*328§ 49-15. After a review of the record, we conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in this case. See New Haven Savings Bank v. Gurland, 3 Conn. App. 508, 489 A.2d 1070 (1985).

The judgments are affirmed and the case is remanded for the purpose of setting new law days.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

720 A.2d 886, 51 Conn. App. 327, 1998 Conn. App. LEXIS 467, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/first-union-national-bank-v-bonito-connappct-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack