First Tower Loan, LLC d/b/a Tower Loan of Winnfield v. Matthew Powell
This text of First Tower Loan, LLC d/b/a Tower Loan of Winnfield v. Matthew Powell (First Tower Loan, LLC d/b/a Tower Loan of Winnfield v. Matthew Powell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment rendered May 21, 2025. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P.
No. 56,236-CA No. 56,241-CA (Consolidated Cases)
COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA
***** FIRST TOWER LOAN, LLC Plaintiff-Appellant D/B/A TOWER LOAN OF WINNFIELD versus
ROY COMBS Defendant-Appellee *****
consolidated with
***** FIRST TOWER LOAN, LLC Plaintiff-Appellant D/B/A TOWER LOAN OF WINNFIELD versus
MATTHEW POWELL, AKA Defendant-Appellee MATTHEW DOMINIQUE POWELL ***** Appealed from the Eighth Judicial District Court for the Parish of Winn, Louisiana Trial Court Nos. 47,276 and 47,491
Honorable Anastasia S. Wiley, Judge ***** ROGERS, CARTER & PAYNE, LLC Counsel for Appellant By: Jessica L. Greber
MATTHEW POWELL, A/K/A In Proper Person MATTHEW DOMINIQUE POWELL *****
Before STONE, MARCOTTE, and ELLENDER, JJ. ELLENDER, J.
In these consolidated cases, First Tower Loan LLC, d/b/a Tower Loan
of Winnfield, appeals 15 default judgments in which the district court
rendered judgments for amounts different from those alleged in the petitions,
verified in the affidavits of correctness, and stated in the proposed
judgments. For the reasons expressed, we amend the judgments to conform
to the records and, as amended, render. A separate opinion is issued for each
borrower.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Matthew Powell, a/k/a Matthew Dominique Powell, of Winnfield,
La., took out a loan from Tower Loan on September 30, 2022. The amount
financed was $4,909.45, at a stated APR of 31.73%, requiring Powell to
make 30 payments of $241.00, for a total of $7,230.00. His final payment
was to be April 9, 2025, but, according to Tower Loan’s petition, his last
payment was on July 24, 2023, leaving a balance of $4,482.78.
Tower Loan filed this suit on January 29, 2024, seeking the unpaid
balance of $4,482.78, together with contractual interest of 30.48% per
annum for one year beginning December 13, 2023, and 18% thereafter. The
petition also prayed for late charges, court costs, collection costs, contractual
attorney fees, and a recognition of its security interest in the movables
described in the loan agreement.
Powell filed no responsive pleading, so Tower Loan moved for
default judgment. In support, it attached an affidavit of correctness executed
by Scott Lee, and officer of the company, verifying that the balance due was $4,482.78 and that the interest rate, under the loan agreement, was 30.48%
for one year beginning December 13, 2023, and 18% thereafter until paid in
full. Tower Loan also provided a proposed judgment stating this balance
due, the interest rate, and other matters not germane to this appeal.
The district court rendered judgment as prayed for, by judgment date-
stamped April 22, 2024. However, on July 15, 2024, the only minute entry
in the record, the court “reviewed record and amended interest.” In the
transcript, the court stated only, “Okay, I’m returning the same to the Clerk.”
The court left the principal amount intact but drew a line through the interest
rate of 30.48%/18%, writing over it, “legal” interest.
Tower Loan has appealed, raising four assignments of error. Powell
has not filed a brief.
DISCUSSION
Compliance with Art. 1702
By its first assignment of error, Tower Loan urges the court erred in
failing to accept Tower Loan’s affidavit of correctness, submitted in support
of the proposed judgment, as prima facie proof of the indebtedness owed
under the promissory note, as required by La. C.C.P. art. 1702(B)(3). By its
second assignment, Tower Loan urges the court erred in failing either to sign
the proposed default judgment or direct that a hearing be held, as required by
La. C.C.P. art. 1702(C).
For the reasons expressed in First Tower Loan v. Combs, 56,236 (La.
App. 2 Cir. 5/21/25), rendered this day, these assignments have merit. The
district court lacked authority to disregard the affidavit of correctness and
erred in not signing the proposed judgment.
2 Award of Interest
By its third assignment of error, Tower Loan urges the court erred in
failing to award interest as prayed for and as mandated by La. C.C. art. 1921.
By its fourth assignment, Tower Loan urges the court erred in reducing
interest in the judgment to “legal interest” from the amount stated in the loan
agreement, contrary to La. R.S. 9:3519 and 9:3522. For the reasons
expressed in First Tower Loan v. Combs, supra, these assignments have
merit.
The loan agreement states that the amount financed was $4,909.45.
Under La. R.S. 9:3519, Tower Loan could charge 24% on the portion of the
principal that exceeds $4,000 but does not exceed $7,000 (this portion would
be $909.45); 27% on the portion that that exceeds $1,400 but does not
exceed $4,000 (this portion would be $2,600); and 36% on the remaining
portion. The affidavit states that these rates, properly apportioned, yield a
contractual rate of 30.48%. Moreover, Powell’s loan was accelerated on
December 13, 2023; hence, after December 13, 2024, the interest cannot
exceed 18%.1 The amount prayed for in the petition, and stated in the
proposed judgment, complies with the applicable laws.
The district court lacked authority to award interest different from that
stated in the loan agreement, the petition, and the affidavit. The judgment
will be amended to provide the contractual and legal rate.
CONCLUSION
For the reasons expressed, the principal and interest stated in the
judgment are amended as follows:
1 In brief, Tower Loan states the cutoff date for contractual interest is April 9, 2026, but this is obviously a typo. 3 IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that there be judgment herein in favor of the plaintiff, FIRST TOWER LOAN, LLC, d/b/a TOWER LOAN OF WINNFIELD, and against the defendant, MATTHEW POWELL, a/k/a MATTHEW DOMINIQUE POWELL (SSN XXX-XX-4703), in the amount of $4,482.78, together with interest thereon at the rate of 30.48% per annum for one year beginning December 13, 2023, and 18% thereafter, until paid.
In all other respects, the judgment is affirmed. All costs are to be paid
by the borrower, Matthew Powell, a/k/a Matthew Dominique Powell.
AMENDED, AFFIRMED AS AMENDED, AND RENDERED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
First Tower Loan, LLC d/b/a Tower Loan of Winnfield v. Matthew Powell, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/first-tower-loan-llc-dba-tower-loan-of-winnfield-v-matthew-powell-lactapp-2025.