First Tennessee Bank v. OTTOMAN

Michigan Supreme Court

First Tennessee Bank v. OTTOMAN

720 N.W.2d 742, 477 Mich. 854

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided September 14, 2006·No. 130974·Published

Opinion

720 N.W.2d 742 (2006)

FIRST TENNESSEE BANK, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Roger OTTOMAN and Marcia Ottoman, Defendants-Appellants, and
Bankone, Third-Party Defendant.

Docket No. 130974. COA No. 266141.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

September 14, 2006.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 22, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

720 N.W.2d 742 (2006)

FIRST TENNESSEE BANK, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Roger OTTOMAN and Marcia Ottoman, Defendants-Appellants, and
Bankone, Third-Party Defendant.

Docket No. 130974. COA No. 266141.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

September 14, 2006.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 22, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

First Tennessee Bank v. OTTOMAN, 720 N.W.2d 742, 477 Mich. 854 (Mich. 2006).

Pincite

720 N.W.2d 742 (First Tennessee Bank v. OTTOMAN) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

FIRST TENNESSEE BANK, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roger OTTOMAN and Marcia Ottoman, Defendants-Appellants, and Bankone, Third-Party Defendant.

FIRST TENNESSEE BANK, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Roger OTTOMAN and Marcia Ottoman, Defendants-Appellants, and
Bankone, Third-Party Defendant.