First Tennessee Bank v. OTTOMAN
720 N.W.2d 742, 477 Mich. 854
This text of 720 N.W.2d 742 (First Tennessee Bank v. OTTOMAN) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
First Tennessee Bank v. OTTOMAN, 720 N.W.2d 742, 477 Mich. 854 (Mich. 2006).
Opinion
FIRST TENNESSEE BANK, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Roger OTTOMAN and Marcia Ottoman, Defendants-Appellants, and
Bankone, Third-Party Defendant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 22, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
720 N.W.2d 742, 477 Mich. 854, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/first-tennessee-bank-v-ottoman-mich-2006.