FIRST STUDENT, INC. v. Coleman

Missouri Court of Appeals

FIRST STUDENT, INC. v. Coleman

324 S.W.3d 776, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1479, 2010 WL 4909933

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 2, 2010·No. ED 94359·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from a judgment setting aside a default judgment she had obtained against plaintiff. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from a judgment setting aside a default judgment she had obtained against plaintiff. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

FIRST STUDENT, INC. v. Coleman, 324 S.W.3d 776, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1479, 2010 WL 4909933 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

324 S.W.3d 776 (FIRST STUDENT, INC. v. Coleman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related