First State Insurance v. J & S United Amusement Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

First State Insurance v. J & S United Amusement Corp.

123 A.D.2d 555, 506 N.Y.S.2d 850, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 60691

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 14, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 123 A.D.2d 555 (First State Insurance v. J & S United Amusement Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

First State Insurance v. J & S United Amusement Corp., 123 A.D.2d 555, 506 N.Y.S.2d 850, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 60691 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

On remittitur from the Court of Appeals, order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Edward J. Greenfield, J.), entered September 26, 1984, which denied defendants-appellants’ motion for summary judgment, reversed, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, and the motion for summary judgment is granted and the complaint dismissed, with costs.

The facts are set forth in the memorandum of this court (114 AD2d 812).

The Court of Appeals, while agreeing with the conclusion, indicated that the reason given was incorrect, and the matter was remitted for the exercise of discretion (67 NY2d 1044). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Ross and Rosenberger, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On remittitur from the Court of Appeals, order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Edward J. Greenfield, J.), entered September 26, 1984, which denied defendants-appellants’ motion for summary judgment, reversed, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, and the motion for summary judgment is granted and the complaint dismissed, with costs.

The facts are set forth in the memorandum of this court (114 AD2d 812).

The Court of Appeals, while agreeing with the conclusion, indicated that the reason given was incorrect, and the matter was remitted for the exercise of discretion (67 NY2d 1044). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Ross and Rosenberger, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

123 A.D.2d 555, 506 N.Y.S.2d 850, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 60691, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/first-state-insurance-v-j-s-united-amusement-corp-nyappdiv-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack