First State Insurance Company v. Western Investment & Development Corp.

895 F.2d 1576
CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit
DecidedFebruary 26, 1990
Docket88-5518
StatusPublished

This text of 895 F.2d 1576 (First State Insurance Company v. Western Investment & Development Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
First State Insurance Company v. Western Investment & Development Corp., 895 F.2d 1576 (1st Cir. 1990).

Opinion

895 F.2d 1576

FIRST STATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
WESTERN INVESTMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORP.; Keck's Drapery
Manufacturing Co.; James C. Barggren; Douglas D. Barman;
Larry Barman; Ben Giles; Harold Murphree; G.L. Scott;
Madonna L. Dunn; John F. O'Donnell; Michael Pelphrey;
Maurice J. Collins; Roy W. Hennings; and John Budesky,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 88-5518.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Feb. 26, 1990.

Before GOODWIN, Chief Judge, BROWNING, TANG, FARRIS, PREGERSON, CANBY, NORRIS, BEEZER, HALL, LEAVY and TROTT, Circuit Judges.ORDER

In light of the parties' settlement of the underlying action, the court concludes that en banc would be improvident and that the appeal should be dismissed for want of a case or controversy.

The order granting en banc review is vacated. The appeal is dismissed as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
895 F.2d 1576, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/first-state-insurance-company-v-western-investment-development-corp-ca1-1990.