First State Bank v. Krueger

Supreme Court of Minnesota

First State Bank v. Krueger

161 N.W. 1054, 136 Minn. 457, 1917 Minn. LEXIS 597

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedFebruary 9, 1917

DocketNos. 20,180—(267)

StatusPublished

This text of 161 N.W. 1054 (First State Bank v. Krueger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

First State Bank v. Krueger, 161 N.W. 1054, 136 Minn. 457, 1917 Minn. LEXIS 597 (Mich. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This action was dismissed at the close of plaintiff’s case upon the ground that there was not sufficient evidence to justify a verdict against defendant. After a careful examination of the record we concur in that conclusion. The right of plaintiff to recover depended upon the question whether defendant ever became the active cashier of plaintiff, or ever assumed the duties' or responsibilities of the position. The evidence will not justify an affirmative answer to the question, and the dismissal was proper.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This action was dismissed at the close of plaintiff’s case upon the ground that there was not sufficient evidence to justify a verdict against defendant. After a careful examination of the record we concur in that conclusion. The right of plaintiff to recover depended upon the question whether defendant ever became the active cashier of plaintiff, or ever assumed the duties' or responsibilities of the position. The evidence will not justify an affirmative answer to the question, and the dismissal was proper.

Order affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

161 N.W. 1054, 136 Minn. 457, 1917 Minn. LEXIS 597, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/first-state-bank-v-krueger-minn-1917.