First State Bank of Lantana v. Goldstein
469 So. 2d 939, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1345, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14315
This text of 469 So. 2d 939 (First State Bank of Lantana v. Goldstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
First State Bank of Lantana v. Goldstein, 469 So. 2d 939, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1345, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14315 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).
Opinion
Appellant has failed to demonstrate that the trial court abused its discretion by dissolving a writ of garnishment when appellant failed to appear for a docket call prior to trial. The court’s inherent power to manage its case load provides ample justification for the action taken.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
469 So. 2d 939, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1345, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14315, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/first-state-bank-of-lantana-v-goldstein-fladistctapp-1985.