First State Bank of Corpus Christi v. Nixon

544 S.W.2d 378, 20 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 101, 1976 Tex. LEXIS 263
Texas Supreme Court·Decided December 15, 1976·No. No. B-6353·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a suit by former employees of First State Bank of Corpus Christi to recover from the Bank certain sums claimed to be owed under a deferred compensation agreement. The trial court rendered summary judgment in favor of the Bank. The Court of Civil Appeals held that the deferred compensation agreement presents a factual issue of ambiguity, and the cause was remanded for trial. 540 S.W.2d 817. The Bank has filed the only application for writ of error. We agree that the summary judgment was incorrect and, accordingly, refuse the writ, no reversible error. We do not by this action indicate an opinion as to whether the construction of the agreement requires the resolution of an issue of fact.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

First State Bank of Corpus Christi v. Nixon, 544 S.W.2d 378, 20 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 101, 1976 Tex. LEXIS 263 (Tex. 1976).

544 S.W.2d 378 (First State Bank of Corpus Christi v. Nixon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Diers, Jones & Stark, Inc. v. Comerica Bank
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2015
Jones v. St. Paul Insurance Co.
725 S.W.2d 291 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1987)
Gulf & Basco Co. v. Buchanan
707 S.W.2d 655 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1986)
City of Dallas v. Texas Water Rights Commission
674 S.W.2d 900 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1984)
Tuthill v. Southwestern Public Service Co.
614 S.W.2d 205 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1981)
Hughes v. Aycock
598 S.W.2d 370 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1980)
N. M. Uranium, Inc. v. Moser
587 S.W.2d 809 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1979)
Skyland Developers, Inc. v. Sky Harbor Associates
586 S.W.2d 564 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1979)